Improving Facebook Search Experience

TL;DR

Study Overview:

  • 25 1:1 interviews with Facebook users from Vietnam, Myanmar, Egypt, Germany, and Indonesia (5 per country).

  • Each participant performed 4 search tasks (100 searches total): recent post, local news, an event, and a person.

  • Participants used their local languages and were asked to think aloud during tasks.

Key Findings:

  • Improve autocomplete accuracy and suggest most-used keywords dynamically.

  • Add autocorrect/typo tolerance to increase first-try success rates.

  • Enhance language support, especially for complex scripts (e.g., Arabic, Burmese).

  • Highlight and simplify filtering options, especially on mobile.

  • Address trust issues with search result sources—consider labels or credibility indicators.

Research Context

This research study was conducted in collaboration with Global App Testing (GAT), a QA testing and research agency with a global network of over 90,000 freelance testers. GAT specializes in delivering UX, localization, and functional testing data for clients worldwide, including major tech companies such as Facebook (Meta).

Partnership and Team Structure

For this project, GAT supported Facebook in executing a cross-cultural UX research study focused on improving the Search experience on Facebook across five diverse regions: Vietnam, Myanmar, Egypt, Germany, and Indonesia.

The collaboration involved two key teams within GAT:

  • UX Research Team (2 our of 5 UX researchers):
    Responsible for research design, participant screening, interviews, analysis, and reporting.

  • Sourcing Specialists Team (1 out of 4 sourcing specialists):
    Focused on recruitment, managing outreach and gathering an initial pool of potential candidates based on Facebook’s study criteria.

The study leveraged GAT’s unique global testing capabilities to uncover how cultural, linguistic, and regional factors impact search behavior on Facebook. By combining rigorous research methods with culturally nuanced recruitment, the project aimed to deliver actionable insights for improving Facebook’s global search functionality - especially in underrepresented markets.

Research goals

Methodology

Research results

1. Task-Based Performance Insights

a. Task 1: Search for a recently seen post

  • Low confidence and rare behavior: 15/25 participants expressed doubt in finding the post; many had never attempted this before.

  • Success rate: 64%

  • Challenges:

    • Difficulty remembering exact phrasing or keywords

    • Mixed content types in results (e.g., posts, images, videos) made it harder to scan

    • SERP perceived as “random” and “cluttered”

  • User feedback:

    “I was pleasantly surprised, I was not expecting to find what I was looking for” – P1, Indonesia

b. Task 2: Search for local news

  • Higher expectations and familiarity: Participants found this easier due to clearer keyword choice and common use case.

  • Success rate: 72%

  • Observations:

    • Searches benefited from trending and viral news topics

    • 14/25 participants voiced mistrust in news sources shown

  • User feedback:

    “I wouldn’t normally read news articles published on this website” – P4, Germany

c. Task 3: Search for an event

  • Common task with moderate success: Many participants actively use Facebook to find or attend events.

  • Success rate: 64%

    • 16/25 found the intended event

    • 12/25 had to rephrase or adjust keywords

    • Filters helped but were underutilized

  • Notable finding: Some users assumed events would be “recommended” without needing a precise search.

d. Task 4: Search for a person

  • Most successful task: High familiarity and consistent usage across all countries.

  • Success rate: 84%

  • Challenges:

    • Nicknames and pseudonyms common in Myanmar and Indonesia

    • Inconsistent results when searching by partial names or transliterated spellings

2. Cross-Cultural & Language-Based Findings

a. Search input and results in local languages

  • Lower relevance and accuracy compared to English searches

  • Myanmar: Search results affected by Zawgyi vs. Unicode rendering issue; caused character corruption and incomplete result sets

  • Vietnam & Indonesia: Many users prefer setting Facebook to English, citing better content visibility and search result quality

  • Egypt: 10 out of 20 Arabic-language searches produced incomplete or no results; participants often switched to English

  • Germany: English vs. German did not affect result accuracy significantly

b. Blocked or limited content

  • Vietnam: Users mentioned possible content suppression due to defamation claims and regulatory blocks; made some topics difficult to search

  • Egypt: Arabic content sometimes failed to surface relevant results or produced formatting issues

c. Mental models & cultural communication styles

  • Germany: Expected direct, precise results; used filters early and confidently

  • Vietnam, Myanmar, Indonesia: Indirect communication styles influenced both expectations and feedback; more tolerant of partial results, but reluctant to criticize

  • Egypt: Verbose but indirect; voiced distrust in sources but avoided direct negative feedback

Recommendations based on key pain points

Impact and learnings

Research impact

  1. Informed product decisions for global audiences

    The study provided Facebook with detailed, country-specific insights into how users from Vietnam, Myanmar, Egypt, Germany, and Indonesia interact with Search. These findings helped shape decisions for improving search functionality in emerging markets where language, infrastructure, and user behavior may differ from the US market.

  2. Improved UX strategy for local language support

    The research highlighted critical issues related to language rendering (e.g., Zawgyi vs Unicode in Myanmar), poor Arabic character handling, and blocked content in Vietnam, leading to new discussions on improving localization and typography handling.

  3. Validated need for search UX enhancements

    The study validated user frustration with existing Search mechanics—such as lack of autocomplete accuracy, no autocorrect, and underutilized filters—prompting Facebook to prioritize UX improvements for search discoverability, especially on mobile.

Key learnings

  1. Search confidence varies by task and culture

    Users felt least confident when searching for recently seen posts, a task rarely performed and poorly supported. In contrast, searching for people had high success rates due to familiarity and habitual usage. Cultural communication styles and expectations of credibility need to be taken into consideration when designing experiences.

  2. Functional Gaps Undermine Trust

    Missing features like autocorrect, search term suggestions, and intelligent result grouping caused users to give up quickly or resort to Google, showing that search trust is fragile and easily lost. Moreover, if filters aren’t discoverable enough, they may as well be invisible (especially on mobile).

  3. Localization requires cultural understanding and technical support

    Localization issues are not just about translation, they involve text rendering, character encoding, and even the sociopolitical environment of the country, all of which can severely influence the user experience and skew results.

Reflections

Working as a UX Researcher at Global App Testing, supporting Facebook as an external consultant, gave me valuable perspective on the unique impact and limitations of working outside an in-house team.

I found myself particularly invested in the outcomes of this study and eager to see our recommendations come to life. It was a moment of reflection: while the consultant role offers reach and variety, I realized how much I value being embedded within a product team, where there’s greater visibility into how insights evolve into real user-facing changes.

However, seeing how the Facebook UX teams work to defined success criteria for a research study was incredibly valuable experience and I appreciated the insight into how product decisions are made in such a demanding environment.

I also became aware of the importance of diversity in user pools - it is essential for UX research because it ensures that insights reflect the experiences, needs, and behaviors of a broad and representative audience. Including users from different cultural backgrounds, languages, age groups, abilities, and tech environments helps uncover edge cases, usability barriers, and localized expectations that might otherwise go unnoticed.